--- description: Learn more about O3 price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in New Zealand. Read verified software reviews and find tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: O3 Pricing, Reviews & Features - Capterra New Zealand 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Construction Project Management Software](/directory/30057/construction-management/software) > [O3](/software/213914/o3) # O3 Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/213914/o3 Page: 1 / 4\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/213914/o3?page=2) > Create, track and manage work packages to support Advanced Work Packaging for industrial Construction. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 74 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses O3? Capital projects, portfolio of projects, lump-sum projects ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.4/5** | 74 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: O3 Insight ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$1.00 - **Pricing model**: Usage Based - **Pricing Details**: Contact O3 for pricing as it varies by total installation cost of each project. - **Target Audience**: 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Chromebook (Desktop), iPhone (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Activity Tracking - Backlog Management - Budget Management - Collaboration Tools - Compliance Management - Data Import/Export - Data Visualisation - Document Management - Equipment Management - File Sharing - Gantt/Timeline View - Inventory Management - Issue Management - Job Costing - Logistics Management - Maintenance Management - Milestone Tracking - Mobile Access - Portfolio Management - Prioritisation - Project Management - Project Planning/Scheduling - Real-Time Updates - Reporting & Statistics - Reporting/Project Tracking - Resource Management - Scheduling - Status Tracking - Task Management - Third-Party Integrations - Work Order Management ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Construction Project Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/30057/construction-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Construction Project Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/30057/construction-management/software) - [Project Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Oil and Gas Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/30588/oil-and-gas/software) - [Agile Project Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/31556/agile-project-management-tools/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Float](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/136078/float) — 4.5/5 (1613 reviews) 2. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (5726 reviews) 3. [Zoho Projects](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/169455/zoho-projects) — 4.5/5 (856 reviews) 4. [Mosaic](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/166936/mosaic) — 4.5/5 (44 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Review from daily user regarding the IWP & constraints" — 4.0/5 > **anil** | *27 May 2021* | Oil & Energy | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Exports my favorite, previously we are able to get gantt chart report as PDF. > > **Cons**: Definitely switching between IWPs, it would be good if we can switch one IWP just in seconds in one page. Currently we are using multiple tabs to do this and sometimes we are loosing time while waiting loading page. > > We are tracking the constraints and IWP status through the O3. It will be good if we can synchronise whole IWP information to O3 such as components, materials, drawings, resources etc. Also, wouldn't it be perfect if everyone can verify\&sign the documents and IWPs directly in O3? ----- ### "Review of O3" — 4.0/5 > **Michael** | *30 August 2023* | Civil Engineering | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: The tracing of pending items and have the cards open for it as kind of reminders > > **Cons**: there were to many function and options which we did not use and which lead to it that the surface looks to crowded and the handling difficult > > In principal very good to keep on focusing on blockers and pending open items and that the entire team could see it. We used it however only once a week, it should have been used at least twice a week ----- ### "Review O3 by Stork." — 3.0/5 > **Pieter** | *16 December 2022* | Mechanical or Industrial Engineering | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: Everyone the same version and updates are directly visable. > > **Cons**: 1/ Unclear which documents are for your project. Over information of documents which is no part of your scope2/ No easily able to get a dump of the task data for creating back-ups or tracking of O33/ if you want to download the 3D model it opens directly instead of only download the source file and that is time consuming. > > Unknown and not enough experience ----- ### "O3 Review" — 5.0/5 > **Kurt** | *16 December 2022* | Oil & Energy | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The schedule readiness activity visibility, consolidation of all project documents to close out, and the ease of identifying My Actions \& My Approvals are all bi benefits. > > **Cons**: Thousands of emails of information that is easily accessible and listed. > > Easy to learn. O3 made my job easier to ensure all documentation is complete and easily accessible for all. ----- ### "Great product and efficient" — 4.0/5 > **roy** | *4 June 2021* | Oil & Energy | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like how constraints have to be completed before jobs are started, however, that can be a "hold up" in some cases. > > **Cons**: i think every portfolio for every job should be the same. i.e. when we have a scaffolding work pack (SWP) its different. > > good ----- Page: 1 / 4\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/213914/o3?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/213914/o3) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | it | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data