--- description: Learn more about TestMu AI price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in New Zealand. Read verified software reviews and find tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TestMu AI Pricing, Reviews & Features - Capterra New Zealand 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automation Testing Tools](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [TestMu AI](/software/170732/lambdatest) # TestMu AI Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/170732/lambdatest Page: 1 / 23\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/170732/lambdatest?page=2) > TestMu AI is a full-stack agentic AI quality engineering platform for planning, executing, and analyzing tests across web, mobile. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 546 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses TestMu AI? Computer software, E-learning, Internet, Publishing, Retail, Financial services, Information technology and services, Web design and development, SaaS, Digital Marketing, SIs, PaaS, Fintech,HealthTech ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 546 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: LambdaTest - **Location**: San Francisco, US - **Founded**: 2017 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$15.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Lifetime: Free for 1 parallel test Live: $19/month (billed monthly) or $15/month (billed annually) for 1 parallel test, increasing per parallel test up to $475/month (billed monthly) or $175/month (billed annually) for 25 parallel tests. Real Device: $35/month (billed monthly) or $25/month (billed annually) for 1 parallel test, increasing per parallel test up to $625/month (billed monthly) or $500/month (billed annually) for 25 parallel tests. Large organizations requiring more than 25 parallel tests should contact LambdaTest directly for a custom quote. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Canada, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic and 43 more ## Features - Audit Trail - Collaboration Tools - Data Visualisation - Project Management - Requirements Management - Software Testing Management - Supports Parallel Execution - Test Script Reviews ## Integrations (15 total) - Asana - Bitbucket - CircleCI - GitHub - GitLab - Hive - Jira - MantisBT - Microsoft Visual Studio - Paymo - Slack - Teamwork.com - Trello - WordPress - monday.com AI Work Platform ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) ## Category - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Performance Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/31124/performance-testing/software) ## Alternatives 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (774 reviews) 2. [ACCELQ](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/161589/accelq) — 4.9/5 (138 reviews) 3. [PFLB](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/205650/PFLB) — 5.0/5 (44 reviews) 4. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (73 reviews) 5. [Centercode](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/187442/centercode) — 4.2/5 (77 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Great platform for cross-browser testing and app validation" — 5.0/5 > **Amara** | *4 July 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I mainly used TestMu AI through the GitHub Student Pack while testing my Flutter application. I liked how easy it was to upload my APK and launch it on different browsers and devices without needing to configure everything locally. The interface is clean and beginner-friendly, and the performance during testing was smooth. I also found the support team responsive when I had questions about my plan. > > **Cons**: The biggest downside was the confusion around the GitHub Student Pack benefits. I initially thought real device testing was included, but later found out it was only available through the freemium sessions. It would be helpful if the differences between browser testing and real device testing were explained more clearly on the dashboard to avoid confusion. > > Overall, my experience has been positive. I used it to test an Android application before sharing it with others, and it saved me time compared to setting up multiple testing environments myself. The platform is easy to navigate, and the cloud testing experience was reliable. I think it's especially useful for students and developers who want to test their applications across different environments without owning multiple devices. ----- ### "Excellant FeedBack working on Cloud devices from LambdaTest" — 5.0/5 > **KETAN** | *16 January 2026* | Banking | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: TestMU AI (prior LambdaTest) is an excellent cloud based testing platform which helped us testing out apps over multiple cloud devices. It provides many variations in which a user can select ranging from Android to iOS, with sim without sin devices. Excellant tool > > **Cons**: Basically the sessions recordings were not great and few of the devices were responding slow subject to their data centres reach and availablity > > It has been a good experience working with the lambda test and it provides us a great support in terms of like app testing (UAT OR production apps), so it was a great platform in which we use to upload our apps through Google drive or manually and then it used to test across many cloud platform ranging from Android to iOS and there are good provisions in which you know you can add multiple devices ----- ### "Real device cloud that’s rarely available" — 2.0/5 > **Eshani** | *17 February 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **Pros**: It’s easy to start using and requires minimal setup. UI is also clean The session recording feature is useful for capturing issues and sharing exact behavior with clients or developers during manual testing. > > **Cons**: Real device availability has been a major issue in our use. New iPhones and Ultra devices are frequently unavailable or show “Device Not Available,” sometimes for long periods. Specially during our peak hours. There is also a gap between the device list you see on Free Trial and what can actually be accessed at the exact same time. Devices appear selectable but cannot be launched on paid plan when needed, making me question the entire point of this Over time, we also saw reliability decline, with sessions failing to start or dropping during manual testing more often than expected. > > Overall experience has been disappointing. Picked testmu because it was cheaper. During the trial the platform looked promising, but in regular use real device availability has been inconsistent, especially for new iPhones and Ultra devices. We frequently encounter “Device Not Available,” Because we rely on manual testing across specific devices for global clients, predictable access is critical. The gap between listed devices and what can actually be launched reduced confidence in using the platform for scheduled validation or release work. While basic sessions and recording are straightforward to use, reliability of real devices has not met expectations, so it has been difficult to depend on. ----- ### "Good user friendly AI platform for Test Automation and Test Management" — 5.0/5 > **Sriram** | *1 June 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Helps in from the beginning state of test plan until the report generation. A great tool usedful for recording the xpaths and the actions. > > **Cons**: Still this requires manual review and correction in case of complex actions covered in the test cases. > > It helps in reducing manual effort by helping teams create, manage, execute, and track tests. Highly useful in improving the test productivity and fasten the software releases. ----- ### "Very Helpful for iOS and Flutter App Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Saumil** | *7 January 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like most about LambdaTest is the easy access to real devices and different iOS versions in one platform. It helps me test iOS and Flutter apps without managing physical devices. The interface is simple and testing setup is quick. It saves a lot of time in daily development and release cycles. > > **Cons**: Sometimes there is a waiting time for popular real devices during peak hours. Also, a few devices can feel a bit slow when the network is not stable. However, overall performance and usability are still good for regular testing work. > > Overall, my experience with LambdaTest has been very good and smooth. It is reliable for testing iOS and Flutter apps on multiple devices and OS versions. The platform is easy to use and saves a lot of testing time. It helps in delivering better quality apps with fewer issues. ----- Page: 1 / 23\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/170732/lambdatest?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/170732/lambdatest) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data