--- description: Learn more about FlowPaper price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in New Zealand. Read verified software reviews and find tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: FlowPaper Pricing, Reviews & Features - Capterra New Zealand 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Digital Magazine Software](/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) > [FlowPaper](/software/155012/flowpaper) # FlowPaper Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/155012/flowpaper Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/155012/flowpaper?page=2) > FlowPaper flipbook maker lets you bring your PDF documents to the web in a friendly and beautiful way while enhancing collaboration. > > Verdict: Rated **4.2/5** by 9 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses FlowPaper? Creative industries, web designers, web publishers ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.2/5** | 9 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 3.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 3.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 3.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Devaldi ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$75.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: 2–10 - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 208 more ## Features - Layout & Design ## Integrations (2 total) - Adobe Connect - Canva ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - Chat ## Category - [Digital Magazine Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) ## Related Categories - [Digital Magazine Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) - [Content Marketing Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/30796/content-marketing/software) - [Graphic Design Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/31010/graphic-design/software) ## Alternatives 1. [WordPress](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/131687/wordpress) — 4.6/5 (14988 reviews) 2. [Adobe InDesign](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/1015781/adobe-indesign) — 4.8/5 (343 reviews) 3. [FlipHTML5](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/202617/fliphtml5) — 4.7/5 (177 reviews) 4. [Adobe Creative Cloud](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/48969/adobe-creative-cloud) — 4.7/5 (7340 reviews) 5. [QuarkXPress](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/178598/quarkxpress) — 4.4/5 (201 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Good Digital Publishing Platform" — 4.0/5 > **Scott** | *17 June 2026* | Consumer Goods | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Pros**: The value for cost proposition is excellent in comparison to many other digital publishing competitors. > > **Cons**: There are frequent issues with trying to edit current publications. This includes text changes and revisions or trying to edit and republish with revisions. These edits or revisions result in unwanted changes to the publication that alter the desired look or state. > > Overall the experience has been good but would like to see the bugs and communication with FlowPaper editors be improved. ----- ### "FlowPaper Flipbook One Year Experience: Ease of Sharing Meets Limited Editing and Help" — 3.0/5 > **Donna** | *10 July 2026* | Medical Practice | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Pros**: 3.5 STARS: FlowPaper, in my opinion is an above average online conversion and publication tool that I use to share medical and genealogical research with professional colleagues and multigenerational family systems. I began using it about a year ago to turn static PDFs into magazine and book like “flipbook” experiences, an upgrade that improves readability, preserves visual fidelity, and makes complex reference material feel more approachable. After a year of use, FlowPaper satisfactorily meets one of my primary objectives: producing engaging, page-forward content that looks and navigates like a designed publication rather than a scanned document. > > **Cons**: I would, however, welcome additional features that feel intuitively interactive within the flipbook itself that is beyond outbound hotlinks that take readers away from the experience. The editing experience is also uneven. While FlowPaper does include an “edit” capability, in my workflow it does not deliver the same level of functional control as dedicated PDF editors such as Adobe Acrobat Pro. The closest thing to an effective editing workflow is the ability to replace a page (or pages), which works well as a practical “patch” mechanism when content changes without requiring a full rebuild. From a usability perspective, the documentation and onboarding are noticeably sparse. The instructions are brief, and the “how-to” guidance for using each feature, especially for creating richer page interactions or animations that is limited. Feature availability also appears to vary depending on whether you use a Zine or Plus Zine plan. In practice, outside of an organization with a dedicated budget, many of the more creative and capability-enhancing tools feel relatively basic. > > Will I continue using FlowPaper? Yes. It reliably converts large PDFs into a manageable, shareable link and delivers a workflow that is straightforward and low-friction. I also value the cloud-based approach: as long as my account remains active, I maintain continuity and control over my published content. If FlowPaper expanded its in-flipbook guidance, improved creative tools, and clarified the conversion outputs left on local storage, it would feel not only functional, but genuinely empowering, like a production-ready publishing platform, rather than a primarily conversion-oriented flipbook viewer. Finally, one recurring technical question is the presence of leftover files on my computer after conversion, more specifically files such as pdf\_40.jpg and pdf\_40.webp. I understand that image assets may be generated during conversion for rendering and optimization, but the role these files play (and why they persist on disk) is unclear to me. Clear, user-facing explanations would reduce friction that are both in terms of storage behavior and what, if anything, should be retained or cleaned up. ----- ### "Thumbs Up for FlowPaper" — 5.0/5 > **Adina** | *14 July 2026* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Pricing and ease of use. Plus: terrific customer support\! They are so quick to respond and so helpful. > > **Cons**: Accessing my file. Choosing folder never works. I use a work-around. But once I can grab the file, it's as easy as pie. > > We used to use a different vendor which we left for various reasons. I stumbled on FlowPaper when reviewing a publication on a different site and was really impressed. Would recommend it to any organization that needs such a product. ----- ### "smooth experience" — 5.0/5 > **sarah** | *4 June 2026* | Hospitality | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like the customer support and all the functions it offers that I am still exploring. It's a lot of fun for content creators working in marketing, such as myself. > > **Cons**: So far, everything is great. I don't have any major concern at the moment and i dont forsee there being any either. > > Overall, it's been a pleasant experience that I look forward to learning more about. There are so many tools withing this program I want to utilize ----- ### "We use Flowpaper to protect sensitive documents from being copied, while sharing with intended users" — 5.0/5 > **William** | *26 June 2018* | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: It is a flexible piece of software. It can be used as a publishing tool to share PDF documents with optional printing, downloading, and full search indexing. It can also be used in a more restrictive way since the viewer can be customized with only the tools you need. We use this as the secure viewer for an online document library. By customizing the viewer we restrict printing and download access and force the documents to be rendered using streaming files. This prevents the documents from arriving on end user hard drives in any usable format, but allows the documents to be viewed in the browser window with 100% fidelity. This is a custom scenario, but several years ago this was the only secure viewer we could find that didn't break the bank. > > **Cons**: There is a steep learning curve and a lot of post purchase programming and customization to make this work. Flowpaper provides some working examples to base your environment on, but it is still a lot of custom programming to integrate. > > Secure document viewing for end users. Protecting a very large online library for theft. Very favorable pricing for what this software accomplishes. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/155012/flowpaper?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/155012/flowpaper) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Structured Data