--- description: Learn more about Assetic price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in New Zealand. Read verified software reviews and find tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Assetic Pricing, Reviews & Features - Capterra New Zealand 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Fixed Asset Management Software](/directory/10026/fixed-asset-management/software) > [Assetic](/software/1066332/assetic) # Assetic Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/1066332/assetic Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/1066332/assetic?page=2) > Assetic is a cloud-based asset management system that helps organizations manage infrastructure assets, compliance \& cost optimization. > > Verdict: Rated **3.8/5** by 10 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **3.8/5** | 10 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Brightly - **Location**: Cary, US - **Founded**: 1999 ## Commercial Context - **Target Audience**: 51–200 - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Category - [Fixed Asset Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.nz/directory/10026/fixed-asset-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Fixed Asset Pro](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/78913/fixed-asset-pro) — 4.5/5 (213 reviews) 2. [Fracttal One](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/159911/fracttal) — 4.6/5 (1773 reviews) 3. [MaintainX](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/179296/getmaintainx) — 4.8/5 (1005 reviews) 4. [Wasp Asset](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/80853/assetcloud) — 4.5/5 (376 reviews) 5. [MapTrack](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/1070016/MapTrack) — 5.0/5 (16 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Utimate solution for Asset Management and Accounting" — 5.0/5 > **Kalana** | *3 September 2024* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Assetic provides me ability to get a great visibility of Council's large asset portfolio. Not only it can provide high level information on finances, asset maturity and asset health but also enable deep dive into specific information in a user-friendly interface. > > **Cons**: Not much I can think at this point based on our usage so far. > > Assetic is easy to navigate and functions are self-explanatory. It took us only a little time to get confidence in using the software to our specific requirements. It enables to slice and dice information to produce reports, develop plans and strategies. Assetic has good level of controls and provide functionalities for all frequently used accounting treatments. ----- ### "Assetic Overal Use Review" — 4.0/5 > **Elaine** | *23 August 2024* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: The reporting is accurate and in real-time, with fully customisable dashboards that can be tailored to my preferences and easily shared. The Tablet App is my favorite feature, as it allows me to work completely remotely in the field without needing any input from a supervisor. All the features on the Tablet is great and helpful towards any work completed with detail and accuracy. > > **Cons**: The inability to change categories is restrictive, and the 16-tile limit per dashboard is a significant hindrance for our large organisation. We need more tiles to accommodate different users and levels effectively. The current history log is quite lacking. We need more user-friendly and detailed information in the history log. > > I have learned Assetic from scratch 3 years ago. I implemented, trained and support 273+ users on Assetic, including both desktop and tablet platforms, achieving a 100% implementation rate. The majority of users are satisfied with Assetic's functionality, accuracy, and ease of navigation, which streamlines our daily reporting. I do like that I can support remotely. I like the platform's basic look and design. Yes, it lacks colour. Yes, it lacks cosmetics, but it is workable and there is a work around for all the issues we encountered so far. Overall, Assetic for me is a 9-star. I have never worked on any other Asset Management System and I don't think I want to. ----- ### "Assetic Cloud Implementation Comments" — 3.0/5 > **Bruce** | *4 August 2024* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: The main driver to move to a cloud based system was the need for mobility. The ability to schedule work and have it show on the field workers tablets is the main driver for our decision to go to Assetic Cloud over myData. The widgets and displays are a nice feature, but my section is yet to delve into that area in earnest. We have been totally focused on end of year for financial assets. > > **Cons**: There are many aspects to an asset register/asset accounting/work management system and it is difficult to answer in a paragraph. Out team has seen many shortcomings in our ability to extract information useful information for management regarding depreciation at a particular facility. I am by no means proficient yet at getting the best out of the system but a number times we can't easily get the information we had been used to easily getting in myData. The need to do multiple imports for one lot of assets being created has increased our work load by a factor of 3 I feel. The system seems quite convoluted and not very intuitive in my opinion. One small example of this to high light my point is in the Fair Value selection under Valuations to go back and look at the previous Valuation Record we have a forward arrow. Odd when we are going back to the previous record. In our data structure in myData using the tree pane on the left we had Segment/Group Name as a Parent Asset to the child asset record and it was used for grouping and reporting at a higher level particularly financialy. Now in Cloud that field called Segment or Group Name is no longer closely associated, and we don't have the ability in reporting in the Component searches the higher grouping. Accountants are particularly disappointed with this as it feels like we have lost some level of functionality. Some might say that is what the Functional Location is for. When we search Component Module / Treatments to report our assets under the Local Government Infrastructure Plan we cannot add in the Segment or Group Name or any Functional Location information so our only option is multiple reports and merge the data in excel. I had hoped with the improvements to data structure from mydata that the searches would be better. These thoughts are off the cuff this morning. I think there is a lot of areas for improving the user experience. > > The implementation was not easy as there seemed to be a no information as to how BRC could get the best setup in Cloud to deliver the best gains for our organisation. Setting up cloud categories and selecting the best use of fields in my opinion was very poorly handled. Not enough understanding of BRC's level of data maturity \& functionality using myData was gained prior to implementing Cloud. The implementation team generally have a good understanding of the product, but I believe more focus \& professionalism is needed on the training front. ----- ### "Survey Response" — 4.0/5 > **Wendy** | *12 August 2024* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: Relatively simple user interface for Asset Register - upload/download tools for asset data > > **Cons**: Maintenance Module seems to be clunky and a bit outdated. We cannot use it to full functionality in terms of logging work orders in the field were there is no phone reception. > > Overall....we are relatively satisfied with Assetic. Probably the best feature is that we have the managed service arrangement to assist us in using the software. ----- ### "\[sensitive content hidden\] are great," — 4.0/5 > **Keiran** | *23 August 2024* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: I think the interface is easy to work with and the field application is also fairly easy to work with. > > **Cons**: I think some of the search profile options could be better, it would be good to not have to jump between multiple modules to get what you need for example, it would be good if there was a overall maintenance module you can pull from instead of it being split down. The new reporting module though in time might take care of this. I also think the mapping module could be better, i.e it would be good if you could use a mapping interface to pull all your out of the system to a csv. > > Rather good, still getting used to searching through the asset fields in there but overall, it functions pretty well. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/1066332/assetic?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.nz/software/1066332/assetic) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data